EMR Development in 2026: What Changes vs. What Stays

EMR development in 2026 — what changed under FHIR versus what stays constant.

EMR development has changed materially since FHIR became mandatory but many fundamentals stay constant. Understanding both dimensions shapes 2026 development planning.

What changed (FHIR-driven)

1. Integration surface = FHIR REST. Custom APIs are legacy; FHIR REST is the ecosystem. 2. Auth = SMART. SMART on FHIR is universal. 3. Analytics = bulk data. Bulk Data IG drives warehouse pipelines. 4. Decision support = CDS Hooks. CDS Hooks fires point-of-care alerts. 5. Compliance = US Core + Inferno. US Core profiles + Inferno verification.

What stays

1. HL7v2 ingestion. Most upstream data is still HL7v2. FHIR complements, doesn't replace. 2. Terminology infrastructure. SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm still dominate. 3. Workflow complexity. Care coordination, referrals, prior auth still complex. 4. Interoperability challenges. Different EHRs, different profiles, different quirks. 5. Regulatory pressure. CMS, ONC still driving requirements.

Development priorities that shifted

Priority 2020 2026
Custom API design High Low
SMART launch investment Low High
Terminology server Optional Required
Bulk data support Optional Required
Custom auth Common Legacy
US Core conformance Nice-to-have Table stakes

Development priorities that stayed

1. HL7v2 handling. 2. Terminology governance. 3. Data quality metrics. 4. Backup and recovery. 5. Multi-tenant isolation.

Team skills mix (mid-2026)

1. FHIR spec fluency (up from optional to required). 2. SMART auth knowledge. 3. Terminology domain understanding. 4. HL7v2 (still needed). 5. General software engineering.

EMR development in 2026 is FHIR-first but not FHIR-only. Teams that balance new FHIR skills with retained fundamentals ship better.

Share: Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Comments are closed.